Timezone Planner
/

Los Angeles → Tokyo Timezone Overlap

Los Angeles → Tokyo Timezone Overlap

Find the best time to meet between Los Angeles and Tokyo. Working hours overlap, pain scores, and DST warnings.

Los Angeles

UTC-7

Tokyo

UTC+9

Time difference

16h

Working hours overlap

1h

24h Timeline (click to select)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Los Angeles

Tokyo

Overlap & scores

Working hours

Off hours

Current UTC hour

Selected

Click a time slot on the timeline to see the pain score.

Best Meeting Times

#1

00:00 UTC

100/100

Los Angeles: 17:00

Tokyo: 09:00

#2

01:00 UTC

93/100

Los Angeles: 18:00

Tokyo: 10:00

#3

23:00 UTC

93/100

Los Angeles: 16:00

Tokyo: 08:00

#4

02:00 UTC

85/100

Los Angeles: 19:00

Tokyo: 11:00

#5

22:00 UTC

85/100

Los Angeles: 15:00

Tokyo: 07:00

Los Angeles and Tokyo have a 16-hour time difference. For remote teams, there are 1 working hours of daily overlap in standard schedules (9–18).

The best meeting window is 17:00–18:00 Los Angeles time (09:00–10:00 Tokyo time).

The 1-hour overlap is a narrow but valuable window — reserve it for critical decisions and blockers. Outside of it, async-first processes keep work flowing: structured tickets, recorded walkthroughs, and clear written context.

Tokyo opens the workday first, 16 hours ahead of Los Angeles. A common pattern: Los Angeles starts with async context from Tokyo, the overlap window handles live decisions, and Tokyo closes with a clear handoff for Los Angeles to act on overnight.

Open in Full Planner

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the time difference between Los Angeles and Tokyo?

The current time difference is 16 hours (UTC-7 vs UTC+9).

What is the best meeting time for Los Angeles and Tokyo?

The best times are between 17:00 and 18:00 Los Angeles time, when both teams are within normal working hours.

Is there enough overlap for remote work between Los Angeles and Tokyo?

The time difference makes synchronous meetings very challenging. An async-first approach is recommended.

Also see